Happy Friday, NOAA Corps,
Today marks two years since a notable NOAA fleet and Corps event: the fire at sea onboard NOAA Ship Rainier. Everyone who has ever conducted maritime or aviation operations, recognizes that a fire at-sea or in the air is one of the scariest and most challenging situations to experience, and as a result, a tremendous amount of planning and training goes into preparing for what everyone hopes will never come to pass. However, recalling my message from several weeks ago, albeit in a slightly different light, the best laid plans oft’ go awry.
Over the course of many hours while completely isolated in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, the officers and crew aboard Rainier negotiated an incredible crucible together. With a range of at-sea experience anywhere from a few days to many years, the ship’s complement came together. They relied on their training, relied on each other, adjusted their approach as-needed through the intense and dynamic blaze, and stood their ground to save the ship and themselves, eventually returning Rainier safely to port.
We may occasionally talk about life crucibles, periods where we suddenly face daunting challenges, severe conditions, and/or slim odds. In a uniformed service, we start our careers in the crucible of basic training, and although unclear in that forging moment, the purpose becomes clear later when we are faced with immense challenges at sea and in the air. Through courage and resilience, we push through these challenges and ultimately unlock enhanced knowledge, experience, and cohesion that carries us forward. Said another way, in the heat of the moment, surrounded by chaos and uncertainty, we come together not as individuals, but as a single, unified team.
It is through this enduring spirit of cooperation and mutual support that we find the foundation of our success, and I profoundly thank you all for your service through Honor, Respect, and Commitment to NOAA and the Nation. Sail and Fly safely out there, and as always, please remember to take care of yourselves and each other.
Best Regards,
Captain Chris van Westendorp, NOAA
Director, Commissioned Personnel Center
10 Sep 2025 | Command Advisory Board |
LCDR Devin Schaefer | 08 Sep 2025 Terminal leave: 01 Jul 2025 |
LCDR Bryan Brasher | 22 Sep 2025 |
ENS Pierce Giamportone | 15 Dec 2025 |
National POW/MIA Recognition Day, marked annually on the third Friday of September, honors Americans who served, despite facing brutal conditions, while being held as Prisoners of War, as well as those personnel still listed as Missing in Action, whose remains have never been recovered.
This year, the US Navy's official ceremony will pay special attention to the unsung heroes of the US Coast & Geodetic Survey who were captured and imprisoned by the Imperial Japanese armed forces during their invasion and occupation of the Philippines. NOAA Corps Director Rear Admiral Chad Cary will be the guest speaker at the ceremony. He will also join naval leaders in placing a memorial wreath at the Lone Sailor Statue during the remembrance. The ceremony will be held under the auspices of Naval District Washington, and will feature the US Navy Ceremonial Guard and Band, including a bugler playing Taps.
During WWII, members of NOAA's ancestor agency, the US Coast & Geodetic Survey, were drawn into the war after Japanese forces invaded the Philippines only hours after their attack on Pearl Harbor. The charting and survey work done by USC&GS and their Philippine partners was vital to the defense of the islands. The head of the USC&GS in the Philippines was killed while trying to save valuable charts and publications from capture. Five other C&GS officers served with the Armed Forces in the defense of the Philippines and were taken as POWs by the Japanese. These men endured brutal captivity from 1942-45 and one officer was killed in the waning days of the war. Uniquely, four of these men also had wives and children in the Philippines who were captured and interred under difficult conditions for the duration of the war. This year's POW/MIA Recognition Day marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the release of the surviving USC&GS POWs and their families.
All current and former NOAA Corps personnel as well as NOAA employees and families are encouraged to attend the ceremony and reflect on the service and sacrifice of their predecessors.
For more information contact Mark Weber, Curator of the NOAA Heritage program, mark.t.weber@noaa.gov
Historical Background
While small and little known, the US Coast & Geodetic Survey (USC&GS) performed exemplary service to the nation during World War II. When the Japanese Empire invaded the Philippine Commonwealth on 8 Dec. 1941, the USC&GS was immediately involved in the defense of the islands. The senior C&GS officer in the Philippines, CDR George Cowie, was killed in action attempting to secure valuable charts, equipment and information vital to the defense of the Philippines. The USC&GS’s ships RESEARCH and FATHOMER and their officers and crews operated in support of the US Armed Forces. Five members of the USC&GS were captured and held as POWs by the enemy. The spouses and children of some of these officers were also interned by the Japanese in the infamous Santo Tomas concentration camp for the duration of the war. One of the captured officers was subsequently killed by Allied attack while being transported to Japan aboard a “Hell Ship” in 1945. The four surviving officers and family members were liberated by US forces in 1945. One of the officers died soon after the war as a result of his treatment while imprisoned. In 1970 the USC&GS became a part of the newly created National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The USC&GS POWs were:
It is critical to a Rated Officer’s career to accurately and appropriately assess their performance through the use of the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). The Officer Evaluation System (OES) manual is a very useful document for writing and understanding OERs and how to accurately and objectively capture an officer’s performance.
Specific information and guidance can be found in the NOAA Corps Directives (NCD) Chapter 4, Part 4 and the Officer Evaluation System Instruction Manual. In accordance with NCD 04404(B)(1), the Rating Chain shall: “Provide an accurate assessment of the rated officer’s current performance, future potential, and value to the NOAA Corps.” It is most important to ensure the comments justify the numerical ratings. An OER should not contain any performance deficiencies that have not already been addressed through prior counseling during the period of report. Please note that for ENS/LTJG OERs, supporting comments for the numerical ratings provided in the NOAA Form 56-6E (short OER Form) are only required for the three selected performance dimensions that best characterize the officer’s performance.
When an officer develops their OER supporting input or is writing OERs for others, remember to include the skill/achievement, the impact of the skill/achievement, and any metrics associated with the skill/achievement. Use of metrics and describing how the officer’s performance impacted/affected the work unit and NOAA is highly encouraged, and providing specific examples to justify ratings helps to support the numerical rating. Rated officers should encourage their supervisor to make an honest assessment of their performance against the text in the scoring dimension blocks and the description for each numerical score. If an officer’s performance meets or exceeds the level described, then the OER comments should capture how the officer is meeting, or exceeding these scores based on the provided descriptions.
Below is a general explanation of each of the scores found within an OER:
Score | General Guidance/Explanation of each score |
---|---|
1 | Performance is substandard and the officer is currently not meeting the expectations or requirements of the supervisor, consistently fails to complete requirements of the job, is not responsive to frequent feedback indicating such performance is unacceptable. |
2 | Performance is still substandard and a major course correction is needed to get back on track to start meeting expectations, periodically fails to complete requirements of job, somewhat responsive to feedback, but is in need of significant attention |
3 | Performance in certain areas requires minor course adjustments to get back on track and show capability of meeting expectations. This score can help highlight areas where the officer has been struggling throughout the reporting period. Remember this is not just a single instance of an issue that has already been corrected, it is to help show an area in which an officer can focus and improve performance to meet requirements and expectations. Officer is aware of their performance and has potential to or show signs of responding positively to feedback and your command will have spoken to you about these specific areas for improvement in advance of writing your OER. |
4 | Performance of the officer matches the expectations of the position. An officer receiving a 4 is consistently doing their job satisfactorily and is a reliable member of the team/workforce. As an officer, a 4 means you are showing up, doing your job well, and consistently contributing to the success of the office. To receive a score of 4, it still reflects strong execution of duties and a job well done. We hold our officers to high standards, and receiving a score of 4 demonstrates you have performed to that expectation. |
5 | Performance of the officer exceeds the expectations of the position and the description provided in the element for a score of 4. As an officer you are doing your job very well, people around you are noticing your contributions, and you are making an impact on the team and mission. Scores of 5 show officers that are making the office or platform a better place to work in by showing constant innovative solutions to different problems. Officers here are showing signs of optimistic leadership and are contributing to a positive work environment. |
6 | Performance of the officer matches the description for the element in the category of 6 and significantly exceeds the expectations of the score of 4. They are making a very significant impact to the office, NOAA Corps and potentially NOAA. Scores of 6 indicate that the officer is doing work that is above their current rank and commensurate with those in the rank above. Scores of 6 indicate an officer went the extra mile to help mission success and or helped innovate without direct instruction or orders. This could arise when doing what is right, even when that is not the popular decision or easy way. |
7 | Performance is flawless. As an officer, you are doing the best work possible in this category. As a rater, there is nothing you can think of or any way the officer could be doing this job better. Scores of 7 are possible, however as a rater you should be unable to identify any room for improvement in the category and be significantly impressed with the performance. |
The table below highlights very simply what each of the scores mean and can be found on page 27 of the OES manual.
These score descriptions are merely suggestions in considering OER scoring - but when a score is selected, thorough documentation is necessary with specific examples of the “so what” resulting from the performance.
Please note:
Most afloat OERs submitted are first reviewed by Marine Center XOs to ensure scoring is accurate and OERs are completed properly. Similarly, aviation OERs go through several levels of review. CPC OER reviewers and validators carefully read OERs to ensure the text provided fully justifies the score. If the text sufficiently justifies the score, then the OER will be validated. If you have any questions or need additional guidance, please contact the Chief, Officer Career Management Division, CDR Emily Rose, chief.careermgmt.cpc@noaa.gov.
As we approach the fall and the follow-on holiday season, all officers are reminded of their personal foreign travel responsibilities. Borrowed from the most recent Department of Commerce Office of Security (OSY) Quarterly Information Security Tips newsletter (see OSY’s September 3, 2025, broadcast email), unofficial foreign travel is required to be reported by Department personnel holding a security clearance or in a sensitive position that is eligible for a security clearance, also known as “covered personnel.” Covered personnel include all cleared employees, NOAA Corps Officers, and federal advisory committee members. Covered personnel shall report travel through the Department’s Reporting Portal at least 30 days prior to travel to the extent possible. The Reporting Portal requires access to a Department network or Virtual Private Network (VPN). For more information on Covered Personnel reporting requirements, please see the Personnel Security office Reporting Requirements site.
The U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Office is looking for a motivated post-XO officer to become the next Chief of Staff. This new position will provide an excellent opportunity to work in a program where leadership and vision are "must have" capabilities, along with strong project management skills. The Officer will work closely in a small office with a broad mission and will have near constant interactions with leadership (ZA-V and SES) as well as with other leaders across NOS and NOAA as well as the many regional ocean observing organizations across the United States.
Billet duties include providing executive level staff support for the Director and Deputy Director, participating or representing IOOS on NOS or other boards/committees at the Deputy Director’s discretion, and overseeing office decision making workflows. The Chief of Staff will also analyze program performance, identify risks, and serve as the lead for emergency response coordination within IOOS. This billet provides countless opportunities for a well-organized and detail oriented officer who thrives in a collaborative environment.
Interested officers should reach out to the incumbent officer, LCDR Aaron Colohan (aaron.d.colohan@noaa.gov),CDR Aaron Maggied, Technical Liaison (aaron.maggied@noaa.gov) or the Deputy Director, U.S. IOOS Office (Krisa.arzayus@noaa.gov) for more information.